人物10380 项目5177 室内582 家居及产品164 文章2381 方案1381 摄影785 视频225 图书201 读者来稿 最新评论21,712 所有作品11371 所有图片154,520
雷姆・库哈斯/大卫‧希艾莱特——OMA合伙人
微博:转发 9 评论 0
雷姆・库哈斯是OMA 的创始人,于1975 年创立 OMA。库哈斯曾获得多个国际性奖项,包括2000 年度普利兹克建筑奖和 2010 年威尼斯双年展金狮终身成就奖。库哈斯同时身兼哈佛大学教授,负责城市项目。大卫‧希艾莱特于2008年加入OMA,在2009年成立OMA 香港辦公室,并于2010 年成为合伙人。大卫‧希艾莱特于燕豪芬理工大学修读建筑及建造科技。在加入OMA 前,他是SeARCH 的总建筑师。
来源:OMA
评论: 0 comments

  项目列表:
  2013年 安信金融大厦,深圳 (初步设计)
  2012年 博然思维集团香港办公室,香港(竣工)
  2012年 国际会展娱乐综合区,悉尼(概念总体规划)
  2012年 莫纳什大学法律和经济综合楼,墨尔本(竞赛)
  2012年 乐曼慕品画廊,香港(竣工)
  2012年 蛇口太子湾开发项目,深圳(概念总体规划)
  2012年 SSI塔楼,雅加达(概念设计)
  2012年 腾讯北京总部大楼,北京(设计深化)
  2012年 活化中环街市项目,香港(需求建议书)
  2012年 广东宝钢大厦,广州(竞赛)
  2012年 水明漾度假村,巴厘岛(概念设计)
  2012年 顺德中心城区市设计,顺德(竞赛)
  2012年 安乐县与平川县总体规划,河内(概念设计)
  2012年 香港·深圳城市\建筑双城双年展,香港(展览)
  2011年 长春市净月文化休闲区,长春(竞赛)
  2011年 独墅湖,苏州(竞赛)
  2011年 外滩环球金融中心,上海(竞赛)
  2011年 恒隆广场,苏州(概念设计)
  2011年 万利丰中心13号牙医诊所,香港(竣工)
  2011年 麦肯锡香港办公室(竣工)
  2011年 港铁 “2020铁路愿景规划”,香港(完成)
  2011年 深圳·香港城市\建筑双城年展,深圳(展览)
  2011年 腾讯滨海大厦,深圳(竞赛)
  2010年 香港珠海学院,香港(施工中,竣时间:2014)
  2010年 大连西岗区域规划,大连(竞赛)
  2010年 香港马凌画廊(竣工)
  2010年 港珠澳大桥香港口岸,香港·深圳(竞赛)
  2010年 前海城岸,深圳(竞赛)
  2010年 西九文化区,香港(概念设计)
  2009年 深圳水晶岛,深圳(竞赛)
  2009年 台北艺术中心,台北(施工中,竣时间:2015)
  2008年 Mahanakhon,曼谷(施工中,竣时间:2014)
  2007年 翠城新景,新加坡(施工中,竣时间:2013)
  2006年 深圳证券交易所,深圳(施工中,竣时间:2013)
  2002年 中央电视台CCTV大楼,北京(竣工)
  2002年 电视文化中心,北京(施工中,竣工时间:2013)

  相关报导
  转载:对话库哈斯——不认为中国人不喜欢央视新楼
  库哈斯——建筑师的建筑师
  雷姆·库哈斯——只手遮天
  建筑革命家/雷姆‧库哈斯(Rem Koolhaas), OMA
  建筑大师雷姆•库哈斯(Rem Koolhaas)访谈
  转载:库哈斯的短板

  雷姆・库哈斯(Rem Koolhaas)
  雷姆・库哈斯是OMA 的创始人,于1975 年创立 OMA。他毕业于伦敦建筑联盟,并于1978 年出版了《癫狂的纽约——一部曼哈顿的回溯性宣言》一书。1995 年,库哈斯在其著作《小、中、大、超大》中,以“一部建筑小说”的形式总结了 OMA 至当时曾参与的项目。库哈斯与六位合伙人一起,共同带领着 OMA 和AMO ,开拓超越建筑的实践。库哈斯曾获得多个国际性奖项,包括2000 年度普利兹克建筑奖和 2010 年威尼斯双年展金狮终身成就奖。库哈斯同时身兼哈佛大学教授,负责城市项目。

  SELECTED HONORS / AWARDS
  Golden Lion Award; Award for Lifetime Achievement
  Appointed to EU Reflection Group by EU Council of Ministers
  The European Council of Foreign Relations
  Dutscher Architektur Preis Honorable Mention,
  Netherlands Embassy, Berlin, Germany
  PraemiumImperiale, Japan
  Membership Legion D’Honneur, Highest French Honour awarded by the French Government
  Pritzker Architecture Prize

  SELECTED EXHIBITIONS
  Cronocaos, 12th International Architecture Exhibition in Venice
  OMA Book Machine, AA, London
  Dubai Next, Vitra Design Museum, Weil am Rhein
  OMA in Beijing, MoMA, New York
  Image of Europe, Heldenplatz, Vienna
  Image of Europe, Rond Point Schuman), Brussels
  Image of Europe, Haus der Kunst, Munich
  Content, Kunsthal, Rotterdam
  Content, Neue Nationalgalerie, Berlin
  Mutations, Raffinerie, Brussels
  Mutations, Arc en Rêve, Bordeaux
  New Urbanism: Pearl River Delta, Documenta X, Kassel
  Rem Koolhaas and the Place of Public Architecture, MoMA, New York / Wexner Museum, Columbus, Ohio
  OMA: The First Decade, Boijmans van Beuningen, Rotterdam
  Deconstructivism (group exhibition), MoMA, New York

  SELECTED BOOKS
  Project Japan: An Oral History of Metabolism, Taschen
  Al Manakh II, Archis
  Al Manakh, Archis,
  Content, Taschen
  Harvard Design School Guide to Shopping, Taschen
  Great Leap Forward, Taschen
  S,M,L,XL, 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, and Monacelli Press NY
  Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan, Oxford University Press

  大卫‧希艾莱特(David Gianotten)
  大卫‧希艾莱特于2008年加入OMA,在2009年成立OMA 香港辦公室,并于2010 年成为合伙人。大卫‧希艾莱特领导OMA 在亚太区的众多项目,他带领设计和监督的项目包括深圳证券交易所、腾讯北京总部以及台北艺术中心。大卫‧希艾莱特领导最近竣工的中央电视台CCTV大楼的最后阶段工作,以及OMA为香港西九文化区设计的发展蓝图。大卫‧希艾莱特于燕豪芬理工大学修读建筑及建造科技。在加入OMA 前,他是SeARCH 的总建筑师。

  获奖:
  2012年 第七届中国国际设计艺术博览会2011-2012年度国际设计艺术成就奖
  2011年 香港透视杂志40 Under 40 (建筑及城市设计组别)
  2010年 君子杂志亚洲年度男士(建筑师组)
  2007年 荷兰建筑学会2007年金字塔国家奖 2006年 美国建筑设计记录先锋奖 1996年 德国汉诺威Constructec建筑奖

  大卫﹒希艾莱特部分演讲
  2012年
  建设•承担——中国上海世界建筑业博览
  香港设计名师对话:伊东丰雄——香港
  亚洲设计论坛:建筑学中的道德与美——香港
  极速建筑II——香港
  OMA亚洲发展——泰国曼谷
  Ik ben altijdArnhemergebleven——荷兰阿纳姆建筑之夜
  都会与建筑——中国北京墨卡托基金会
  跟着金钱走—— 香港大學上海教育中心
  企划中国和未来——香港中文大学
  2011年
  何故身在此处——澳洲布里斯本HEAT
  高层建筑立面设计——新加坡
  OMA 及OMA在亚洲——美国三藩市史丹福大学
  JongArsitek! ——印尼雅加达
  展‧述——英国伦敦巴比肯艺术中心
  建筑的速度——英国伦敦巴比肯艺术中心
  建筑2.0 —中国——荷兰建筑学会
  深圳与世界—OMA 的立场——中国深圳
  2010年
  城市与建筑——香港大學
  保持立场——中国上海荷兰文化中心开幕主题演讲
  批判态度——中国北京清华大学
  2009年
  珠三角城市发展——中国深圳“深圳双年展”
  2008年
  发展中国家可持续住房——荷兰
  文化与城市——香港设计营商周

  OMA

  OMA是一家世界前沿的国际合伙人事务所,从事建筑师设计、城市规划及文化分析。OMA的建筑及规划项目遍布全球,致力追求建筑物灵动的造型,创造日常空间使用的不同可能性。OMA由七位合伙人领导。包括雷姆·库哈斯、大卫·希艾莱特、Ellen van Loon、 Reinier de Graaf、Shohei Shigematsu、Lyad Alsaka 以及管理合伙人Victor van der Chijs,在鹿特丹、纽约,北京及香港均设有事务所,并将于多哈成立新事务所。

  正在兴建的OMA作品包括台北艺术中心;位于北京、毗邻中央电视台CCTV大楼的电视文化中心;地位等同NASDAQ交易所的深圳证券交易所;位于卡塔尔首都多哈的三个项目,以及荷兰最大型的建筑物De Rotterdam.

  OMA近期完成的作品包括位于北京、将摩天大楼重塑成环形的CCTV大楼;伦敦的罗斯柴尔德新总部大楼——新院(2011);美国康乃尔大学建筑,美术及规划学院延伸部分米尔斯坦堂(2011);格拉斯哥的癌症疗养中心Maggie’s Centre(2011);美国达拉斯的威利剧院(与REX联合设计,2010)、韩国首尔可多角度转向的多用途展亭Prada Transformer(2009)。其他备受好评的项目包括葡萄牙波尔图市音乐厅(2005)、西雅图中央图书馆(2004)、柏林的荷兰大使馆(2003)、芝加哥的伊利诺理工学院学生活动中心(2003)及纽约的Prada 旗舰店(20010等。

  雷姆·库哈斯及OMA的作品曾获多个国际奖项,包括2000年的普拉兹建筑奖,2003年的日本皇室世界文化奖、2004年的英国皇家建筑师学会(RIBA)金质奖章,2005年的密斯·凡·德罗欧洲当代建筑奖及2010年威尼斯建筑双年展终身成就金狮奖。

  OMA亚洲

  OMA亚洲于2006年在北京成立,主要工作是监理新近竣工的中国中央电视台CCTV大楼的建设,在监理CCTV大楼与之毗连的电视文化中心(TVCC)项目以外,OMA亚洲为曼谷的Mahanakhon 大楼和新加坡放入翠城新景进行设计方案,目前这两个项目均在建设中。OMA北京办公室目前正监督管理电视文化中心项目二期工程的建设。

  OMA香港办公室于2009年成立,为台北艺术中心,香港珠海学院以及深圳证券交易所提供设计和施工监理。OMA香港办公室的业务范围涵盖大中华区,东南亚和太平洋地区,所负责的项目包括各种类型和规模。从室内设计项目,各类建筑设计,以至总体规划,当中包括香港西九文化区设计方案。OMA香港办公室已竣工项目包括2010年开业的香港马凌画廊、麦肯锡香港办公室和万利丰中心13号牙医诊所,后两个项目均于2011年竣工,事务所目前监督的项目包括北京腾讯总部大楼的设计、雅加达的SSI塔楼设计,以及澳大利亚悉尼国际会展娱乐综合区总纲规划。

  OMA亚洲由合伙人大卫·希特莱特(David Gianotten)联同协理姚东梅、傅唐安(Adam Frampton)、金刹迪(Ravi Kamisetti) 和Michael Kokora带领,员工总数约100人。

  图片及文字来源:OMA

普利兹克建筑奖——雷姆·库哈斯
获奖揭晓
Announcement

Rem Koolhaas of The Netherlands Is the Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureate for the Year 2000

Los Angeles, CA—Rem Koolhaas, a 56 year-old architect from the Netherlands, has been named the Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureate for the year 2000.

In Europe, he has a number of completed projects that have won high praise from critics, including a residence in Bordeaux, France; the Educatorium, a multifunction building for Utrecht University in the Netherlands; the master plan and Grand Palais for Lille, France which is his largest realized urban planning project; and the Kunsthal, providing exhibition space, a restaurant and auditoriums in Rotterdam.

In a development in Fukuoka, Japan, his Nexus Housing is a project consisting of 24 individual houses, each three stories high. Koolhaas also has projects in Portugal, Korea and Germany, the latter being a new embassy for the Netherlands in Berlin, which is currently under construction.

He has a number of major commissions in the United States that will come to fruition within the next two years: a student center for the predominantly Mies van der Rohe campus of the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago and a new central public library for Seattle, as well as buildings in San Francisco and Los Angeles. Koolhaas has also been working for Universal Studios, owned by the Seagram Company, on a master plan and headquarters buildings.

Koolhaas’ work and ideas often spark critical debate in areas in which he has been working. While his radical design for the Seattle Public Library has won praise there, initial reports described Seattle as “bracing for a wild ride with a man famous for straying outside the bounds of convention.”

“It seems fitting that as we begin a new millennium, the jury should choose an architect that seems so in tune with the future,” says Thomas J. Pritzker, president of The Hyatt Foundation, “In fact, Koolhaas has been called a prophet of a new modern architecture. It’s not surprising that the Museum of Modern Art has had not one, but two exhibitions devoted to his ideas.”

The Bordeaux house, named as Best Design of 1998 by Time magazine, is one of his most important works, designed to fill the needs of a couple whose old house had become a prison to the husband who has been confined to a wheel chair following an automobile accident. Koolhaas proposed a home in three sections, actually what he prefers to describe as three houses, one on top of the other. The lowest part he calls “cave-like, a series of caverns carved out from the hill for the most intimate life of the family.” The “top house” is divided into spaces for the couple, and spaces for their children. Sandwiched in between is an almost invisible glass room, half inside, half outside, meeting the grade on one side, where the client has his own room for living. This room is actually a vertically moving platform, 3 X 3.5 meters (10 X 10.75 feet ), functioning as an elevator, which allows the man access to all levels. One wall of the elevator is a continuous surface of shelves providing access to books for his work.

Koolhaas published his first book, Delirious New York , in 1978. Author James Steele described it as “an offbeat but well-expressed and incisive look at the pattern of urban growth.” A Los Angeles Times article described the book as “bulging with novel theories and images about that city—among them an image of the Chrysler Building in bed with the Empire State Building.”

More recently, he wrote S, M, L, XL, which Time magazine called “the ultimate coffee-table book for a generation raised on both MTV and Derrida.” The Pritzker jury considers Koolhaas’ writings so important that the prize citation says he is as well known for his books, plans and academic explorations as he is for his buildings.

Pritzker Prize jury chairman, J. Carter Brown, commented, “Rem Koolhaas is widely respected as one of the most gifted and original talents in world architecture today. The leader of a spectacularly irreverent generation of Dutch architects, his restless mind, conceptual brilliance, and ability to make a building sing have earned him a stellar place in the firmament of contemporary design.”

Bill Lacy, the executive director of the Pritzker Prize, wrote in his 1991 book, 100 Contemporary Architects, “As an architect/philosopher/artist, Dutchman Rem Koolhaas has expanded and continues to expand our perceptions of cities and civilization.”

Lacy, who is president of the State University of New York at Purchase, added, “Koolhaas has amassed an intriguing array of brilliant projects that continually blur the line between urban design and architecture. He has a rare talent and ability to think in design terms that range from the smallest construction detail to the concept for a regional master plan.”

The formal presentation of what has come to be known throughout the world as architecture’s highest honor will be made at a ceremony in Jerusalem, Israel on May 29, 2000. At that time, Koolhaas will be presented with a $100,000 grant and a bronze medallion. He is the first Pritzker Laureate from the Netherlands, and the 23rd to be honored.

简历
Biography

Born in Rotterdam, Rem Koolhaas spent four years of his youth in Indonesia, where his father served as director or a newly formed cultural institute. Following in the footsteps of his literary father, Koolhaas began his career as a writer. He was a journalist for the Haase Post in The Hague, and later tried his hand at writing movie scripts.

Koolhaas’s writings won him fame in the field of architecture before he completed a single building. After graduating from the Architecture Association School in London in 1972, he received the Harkness Fellowship for travel and research in the United States. During this period, he wrote Delirious New York, which he described as a “retroactive manifesto for Manhattan” and which critics hailed as a classic text on modern architecture and society.

In 1975, Koolhaas founded the Office for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) in London with Madelon Vriesendorm and Elia and Zoe Zenghelis. Focusing on contemporary design, the company won a competition for an addition to the Parliament in The Hague and a major commission to develop a master plan for a housing quarter in Amsterdam.

In 1987, Koolhaas was hired to design and build the Netherlands Dance Theater in The Hague. Composed of three areas, including a stage and auditorium, a rehearsal studio, and a complex of offices and dressing rooms, the theater garnered Koolhaas immediate acclaim.

Delirious New York was reprinted in 1994 under the title Rem Koolhaas and the Place of Modern Architecture. The same year, he published S,M,L,XL in collaboration with the Canadian graphic designer Bruce Mau. Described as a novel about architecture, the book combines works produced by Koolhaas’s Office for Metropolitan Architecture with photos, plans, fiction, cartoons and random thoughts. The title refers to the way the architect decided to arrange the book: instead of a chronological timeline, it is organized by project size.

Koolhaas has designed a number of residences, cultural buildings and an “educatorium” a name alluding to a factory of learning, a shared facility at Utrecht University, among many other projects and planning commissions. In a major competition, Koolhaas was selected to design the new Campus Center at Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, one of the first new structures on the historic campus designed by Mies Van der Rohe. In 1999, he was awarded the commission to design the new main library for the city of Seat …

评语
Jury Citation

Rem Koolhaas is that rare combination of visionary and implementer—philosopher and pragmatist—theorist and prophet—an architect whose ideas about buildings and urban planning made him one of the most discussed contemporary architects in the world even before any of his design projects came to fruition. It was all accomplished with his writings and discussions with students, many times stirring controversy for straying outside the bounds of convention. He is as well known for his books, regional and global plans, academic explorations with groups of students, as he is for his bold, strident, thought provoking architecture.

His emergence in the late seventies with his book Delirious New York was the start of a remarkable two decades that have seen his built works, projects, plans, exhibitions and studies resonate throughout the professional and academic landscape, becoming a lightning rod for both criticism and praise.

One of his earliest plans for the expansion of the Dutch Parliament aroused such interest that other commissions followed. The Netherlands Dance Theatre in The Hague was one of the first completed projects to garner critical acclaim from many quarters. Since then, Koolhaas’ commissions have ranged in scale from a remarkably inventive and compassionate house in Bordeaux to the master plan and giant convention center for Lille, both in France. The Bordeaux house was designed to accommodate extraordinary conditions of use by a client confined to a wheel chair without sacrificing the quality of living. Had he only done the Bordeaux project, his niche in the history or architecture would have been secure. Add to that a lively center of educational life, an Educatorium (a made up word for a factory for learning) in Utrecht, as well as housing in Japan, cultural centers and other residences in France and the Netherlands, and proposals for such things as an Airport Island in the North Sea, and you have a talent of extraordinary dimensions revealed.

He has demonstrated many times over his ability and creative talent to confront seemingly insoluble or constrictive problems with brilliant and original solutions. In every design there is a free-flowing, democratic organization of spaces and functions with an unselfconscious tributary of circulation that in the end dictates a new unprecedented architectural form. His body of work is as much about ideas as it is buildings.

His architecture is an architecture of essence; ideas given built form. He is an architect obviously comfortable with the future and in close communication with its fast pace and changing configurations. One senses in his projects the intensity of thought that forms the armature resulting in a house, a convention center, a campus plan, or a book. He has firmly established himself in the pantheon of significant architects of the last century and the dawning of this one. For just over twenty years of accomplishing his objectives—defining new types of relationships, both theoretical and practical, between architecture and the cultural situation, and for his contributions to the built environment, as well as for his ideas, he is awarded the Pritzker Architecture Prize.

获奖感言
Ceremony Acceptance Speech

Rem Koolhaas

I have prepared a short speech. And maybe I should start with an anecdote. It may be a strange anecdote, but coming from the Netherlands, and being born in 1944, meant paradoxically that I was ignorant of the issue of Jewishness until the age of twenty-one. In my youth, in my country, it was, completely unusual to indicate anyone’s religious or racial background, and it was an issue that we never spoke about. That changed drastically when I first came to New York, and was welcomed, on the Institute for Architecture and Urban studies, led by the architect Peter Eisenman, who deserves, in my view, the Pritzker Prize even more than me.

The first time I was there, Peter Eisenman took me by my coat like this, in a very aggressive way, and said, “Do you know why you’re here, Koolhaas?” And I said, “No.” “You are here to represent the Gothic element.” So that put me in my place, and probably explains some of the feelings of my situation here.

Anyway, I want to begin by performing my thank you’s. I thank Cindy Pritzker and the Pritzker Family and its foundation for their exceptional identification with architecture. I thank the jury who make such an inspired decision this year. I thank my partners at my office O.M.A. Each and every five-hundred-fifty of them have made the contribution that now turns out to be critical. I thank the Harvard Design School for supporting my double life as a futurist. And I thank my clients who triggered our work by burdening us with their needs.

After my thank you’s I have written three little anecdotes, or three little episodes that for me indicate both the recent past of architecture, the current situation of architecture and the perhaps imminent, future of architecture. And, I want to discuss some of the potential evolutions that I—if I’m not careful it will blow away the evolution that may happen in the imminent future. I want to start in 1950—fifty years ago.

Fifty years ago, the architectural scene was not about a unique individual, the genius, but about the group, the movement. There was no scene. There was an architectural world. Architecture was not about the largest possible difference, but about the subtleties that could be developed within a narrow range of similarities within the generic. Architecture was a continuum that ended with urbanism. A house was seen as a small city. The city was seen as a huge house. This kind of architecture saw itself as ideological. Its politics stretched all the way from socialism to communism and all the points in between. Great themes were adopted from beyond architecture, not from the imagination of the individual architect’s brain. Architects were secure in their alignment with what was then called society, something that was imagined and could be fabricated. It is now 2000, fifty years after the idyllic caricature that I just described for you. We have Pritzkers, there is a fair amount here sitting on the first row—therefore we have unique and singular identities, signatures even. We respect each other, but we do not form a community. We have no project together. Our client is no longer the state or its derivations, but the private individuals often embarked on daring ambitions and expensive trajectories, which we architects support whole heartedly.

The system is final: the market economy. We work in a post- ideological era and for lack of support we have abandoned the city or any more general issues. The themes we invent and sustain are our private mythologies, our specialization’s. We have no discourse about territorial organization, no discourse about settlement or human co-existence. At best our work brilliantly explores and exploits a series of unique conditions. The fact that this site’s archeological aspect is emphasized above its political charge, shows the political innocence is an important part of the contemporary architect’s equipment.

I am grateful that the jury’s text for the 2000 prize, casts me as defining new kinds of relationships, both theoretical and practical, between architecture and the cultural situation. That is indeed a sense of what I’m trying to do. Although I am very bad at predicting the future, too preoccupied by the present, let us speculate for a moment about the next fifty years interval—architecture as it will be practiced in two thousand fifty, or if we are lucky, a little bit sooner.

One development is certain. In the past three years, brick and mortar have evolved to click and mortar. Retail has become e-tail and we cannot exaggerate the importance of those things enough. Compared to the occasional brilliance of architecture now, the domain of the virtual has asserted itself with a wild and messy abandon and is proliferating at a speed that we can only dream of. For the first time in decades, and maybe in millennia, we architects have a very strong and fundamental competition. The communities we cannot imagine in the real world will flourish in virtual space. The territories and demarcations that we maintain on the ground are merged and morphed beyond recognition in a much more immediate, glamorous and flexible domain—that of the electronic.

After four thousand years of failure, Photoshop and the computer create utopias instantly. At this ceremony in this location, architecture is still fundamentally committed to mortar, as if only the proximity to one of the largest piles assembled in the history of mankind reassures us about another two thousand years of lease on our particular niche, and our future credibility. But the rest of the world has already liberated architecture for us. Architecture has become a dominant metaphor, a controlling agent for everything that needs concept, structure, organization, entity, form. Only we architects don’t benefit from this redefinition marooned in our own Dead Sea of mortar.

Unless we break our dependency on the real and recognized architecture as a way of thinking about all issues, from the most political to the most practical, liberate ourselves from eternity to speculate about compelling and immediate new issues, such as poverty, the disappearance of nature, architecture will maybe not make the year two-thousand-fifty. Thank you.

相关POST
OMA/CCTV大楼 0594
中央电视台(CCTV) 大楼旨在为单调重复的摩天大楼类型...
普利兹克建筑奖
普利兹克建筑奖(Pritzker Architecture Prize)一年...
“艾·库库”系列访谈——受访人:俞孔坚
这个价值取向我认为第一就说这种长官意识,集权意识。...
“艾·库库”系列访谈——受访人:王戈
王戈:我觉得是很重要的一个提高...中国实践对我们有...
转载:央视大楼获全球最佳高层建筑
世界高层建筑学会“2013年度高层建筑奖”评选7日晚在...
OMA/西九文化区(方案) 0505
  我们发展西九文化区,必须面对一项挑战:将一个盛...
顺德中心城区城市设计/OMA
创作一个地方的新特色并不等同抹煞原有特点,却反而可...
OMA/马凌画廊 0424
设计师为这一画廊空间进行了两部分不同空间对比的设计...
OMA/深圳证券交易所 0687
证券交易市场的精粹是投机:基于资本,而非重力。对于...
转载:雷姆·库哈斯——只手遮天
伊东丰雄说:“雷姆·库哈斯是一个将作为社会现象的建...
竞赛:上海外滩金融中心/OMA
  上海是由各种尺度与风格拼凑而成的城市,随着历史...
OMA/台北艺术中心 0284
台北艺术中心由三个剧场组成,每个剧场都可独立自主地...
安信金融大厦/OMA
作为中国发展最快的服务业和商业中心,深圳提供了最理...
OMA/前海城岸(方案) 0425
前海是中国大陆与香港之间的重要门户,是珠江三角洲其...
竞赛:宝钢集团广东总部和办公大楼/OMA
广东宝钢大厦提供总建筑面积达84,333㎡的甲级写字楼,...
腾讯滨海大厦/OMA
建成后的腾讯滨海大厦的主概念是创造一座“互连”的塔...
转载:库哈斯的短板
来源:俞挺豆瓣 发表时间:2011年4月 库哈斯的短...
刘珩,南沙原创/时代美术馆 0409
建筑师希望借此美术馆设计制造一个关于体验艺术制作过...
更多>>
大卫‧希艾莱特(David Gianotten)
2016-2-15 发布了新的 [方案] OMA/西九文化区(方案) 0505
  我们发展西九文化区,必须面对一项挑战:将一个盛载政府极大抱负、以及持分者多元利益的超大型多用途项目,转化成一个既有趣又严肃、既有规划又容许即兴、既中国化又国际化的文化区。这个文化区规模庞大,但不失亲密融洽的感觉;富地标性,但十分实在;容易理解,却能带来惊喜。为免造成过分冲击,...……
2016-2-15 发布了新的 [方案] 顺德中心城区城市设计/OMA
创作一个地方的新特色并不等同抹煞原有特点,却反而可以为当地添上新意义。一脉相城赋予顺德作为现代服务业中心的新角色,同时保存当地的工业及自然环境。……
2016-2-15 发布了新的 [方案] 竞赛:上海外滩金融中心/OMA
  上海是由各种尺度与风格拼凑而成的城市,随着历史的演进,这里产生了多元化的传统、殖民地、共产和「后现代」建筑,表达了上海市独一无二的身份。在以上种种风格各异的建筑物之中,外滩金融中心这个综合用途发展项目自然地能够应对并突显上海市和而不同的特质,然而却不需要放弃这些特质本身的好处...……
汇报视频 等1人赞过
汇报视频: 打扰您了,请问需要制作投标多媒体视频吗?
2020-06-09 22:11:23 回复 举报
评论需先 登录
雷姆·库哈斯 (Rem Koolhaas)
2016-2-15 发布了新的 [方案] OMA/西九文化区(方案) 0505
  我们发展西九文化区,必须面对一项挑战:将一个盛载政府极大抱负、以及持分者多元利益的超大型多用途项目,转化成一个既有趣又严肃、既有规划又容许即兴、既中国化又国际化的文化区。这个文化区规模庞大,但不失亲密融洽的感觉;富地标性,但十分实在;容易理解,却能带来惊喜。为免造成过分冲击,...……
2016-2-15 发布了新的 [方案] 顺德中心城区城市设计/OMA
创作一个地方的新特色并不等同抹煞原有特点,却反而可以为当地添上新意义。一脉相城赋予顺德作为现代服务业中心的新角色,同时保存当地的工业及自然环境。……
2016-2-15 发布了新的 [方案] 竞赛:上海外滩金融中心/OMA
  上海是由各种尺度与风格拼凑而成的城市,随着历史的演进,这里产生了多元化的传统、殖民地、共产和「后现代」建筑,表达了上海市独一无二的身份。在以上种种风格各异的建筑物之中,外滩金融中心这个综合用途发展项目自然地能够应对并突显上海市和而不同的特质,然而却不需要放弃这些特质本身的好处...……
汇报视频 等1人赞过
汇报视频: 打扰您了,请问需要制作投标多媒体视频吗?
2020-06-09 22:11:23 回复 举报
评论需先 登录
2000.01.01
请帖个标签,写个点评吧!
标签(多个标签用逗号隔开) 登录可保存标签
绑定新浪微博可评论

小贴士


标签收藏可以有利于您以后的内容分类管理
->进入收藏管理页


blog comments powered by Disqus